Official Corruption Prosecutions for July 2025

Number Latest Month 25
Percent Change from previous month -32.4
Percent Change from 1 year ago -39.0
Percent Change from 5 years ago
(Including Magistrate Court)
15.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago
(Excluding Magistrate Court)
15.1
Table 1. Criminal Official Corruption Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2025 the government reported 25 new official corruption prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 32.4 percent over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with official corruption-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).

When monthly 2025 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-39%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 15.9 percent from levels reported in 2020.


Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Official Corruption Prosecutions

The increase from the levels five years ago in official corruption prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of official corruption prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Within the broad category of official corruption, cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

Case types within official corruption are

  • Federal Corruption - Procurement

  • Federal Corruption - Program

  • Federal Corruption - Law Enforcement

  • Federal Corruption - Other

  • State Corruption

  • Local Corruption

  • Other Public Corruption

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in July 2025 was for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Law Enforcement", accounting for 48 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Local" (12%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Other" (8%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Procurement" (8%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Program" (8%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Other" (8%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-State" (8%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for official corruption prosecutions in July 2025 was FBI accounting for 24 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of official corruption referrals were: FBI (24% ), Justice Other (12%), Postal (8%), Commerce (4%). See Figure 3.

Pie chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2. Specific Types of Prosecutions
Pie chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3. Prosecutions by Investigative Agency

Official Corruption Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2025, 2 defendants in official corruption cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in July the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 18 U.S.C Section 641 involving "Public money, property or records". This was the lead charge for 50 percent of all magistrate filings in July.

Official Corruption Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2025, 23 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 1 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of official corruption matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2025.

Lead Charge Count Rank  
18 USC 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses 13 1 More
18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 2 2 More
18 USC 241 - Conspiracy against rights 1 3 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 1 3 More
18 USC 641 - Public money, property or records 1 3 More
18 USC 666 - Theft or bribery in programs receiving Fed funds 1 3 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 1 3 More
18 USC 1344 - Bank Fraud 1 3 More
18 USC 1346 - Scheme or artifice to defraud 1 3 More
18 USC 1703 - Delay or destruction of mail or newspapers 1 3 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 1 3 More
Table 2. Top Charges Filed

  • "Bribery of public officials and witnesses" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 201) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Hobbs Act" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1951.

  • Ranked 3rd were "Conspiracy against rights" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 241, "Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 371, "Public money, property or records" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 641, "Theft or bribery in programs receiving Fed funds" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 666, "Fraud/false statements or entries generally" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1001, "Bank Fraud" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1344, "Scheme or artifice to defraud" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1346, "Dela.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2025 the Justice Department's case-by-case records show that the government brought 8.6 official corruption prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the number of official corruption prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.


Judicial District Count Rank  
Ga, S 9 1 More
Cal, C 2 2 More
N Mexico 2 2 More
Ohio, N 2 2 More
W Virg, N 2 2 More
Ala, N 1 6 More
Arizona 1 6 More
D. C. 1 6 More
Ind, N 1 6 More
La, E 1 6 More
Maryland 1 6 More
Mass 1 6 More
Table 3. Top 10 Districts

  • The Southern District of Georgia (Savannah) — with 9 prosecutions — was the most active during July 2025.

  • The Central District of California (Los Angeles), District of New Mexico, Northern District of Ohio (Cleveland) and Northern District of West Virginia (Wheeling) ranked 2nd.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new official corruption crime cases of this type during July 2025 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank  
Cheesbro, Benjamin W. Ga, S 9 1 More
Logan, Steven P. Arizona 1 2 More
Wright, Otis D., II Cal, C 1 2 More
Kronstadt, John Arnold Cal, C 1 2 More
Mastroianni, Mark Gerald Mass 1 2 More
Nugent, Donald C. Ohio, N 1 2 More
Adams, John R. Ohio, N 1 2 More
Table 4. Top Ten Judges

All 7 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of official corruption filings.

  • Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro in the Southern District of Georgia (Savannah) ranked 1st with 9 defendants in official corruption cases.

  • Judges Steven P. Logan in the District of Arizona, Otis D. Wright, II in the Central District of California (Los Angeles), John Arnold Kronstadt in the Central District of California (Los Angeles), Mark Gerald Mastroianni in the District of Massachusetts, Donald C. Nugent in the Northern District of Ohio (Cleveland) and John R. Adams in the Northern District of Ohio (Cleveland) ranked 2nd with 1 defendants in official corruption cases.

Report Generated: September 25, 2025
TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2025, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page