Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court)
30.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court)
22.4
Table 1. Criminal Prosecutions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2025 the government reported 937 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 14.6 percent over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).
When monthly 2025 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the number of filings was up (6.8%).
Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 30.6 percent from levels reported in 2020.
The growth in
these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases
are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in
prosecutions is 22.4 percent instead of 30.6 percent.
The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases
by the Justice Department.
Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Prosecutions
The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1.
The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month
basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court,
the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends.
The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.
The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in July 2025 was for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen", accounting for 27.1 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (13.9%), "Violence-Other" (10.4%), "Project Safe Childhood" (8%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (7.6%), "Violence-Indian Country" (4.5%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (3.3%), "Fraud-Other" (3.3%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (2.9%), "Fraud-Health Care" (2.7%), "Bank Robbery" (2%).
See Figure 2.
Figure 2. Specific Types of Prosecutions
Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In July 2025, 200 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts.
These courts handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In
addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before
an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter
starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court
where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in July the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 involving "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A". This was the lead charge
for 13.5 percent of all magistrate filings in July.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "18 USC 111 - Assaulting, resisting, impeding certain officers" (9.5%), "18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts" (8%), "18 USC 1114 - Protection of officers and employees of US" (7.5%).
Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In July 2025, 737 defendants in new cases
for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there
were an additional 214 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate
courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information
was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and
therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters
filed in U.S. District Court during July 2025 referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
"Attempt and conspiracy" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 846) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
"Attempt and conspiracy" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 846) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841.
"Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922.
"Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest
increase in prosecutions — up 30.8 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 2250
that involves " Fail to register as sex offender after traveling interstate commerce ".
This was the same statute that had the largest increase — 130.9 % — when compared with five years ago.
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest
decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago — down 21.1 percent — was
" Hobbs Act " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1951 ).
Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions — 5.5 percent — was
for filings where the lead charge was " Bank robbery and incidental crimes " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113 ).
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
In July 2025 the Justice Department's case-by-case records show that the government brought 340.7 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.
Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3.
Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.
Table 3. Top 10 Districts (per ten million people)
The District of New Mexico — with 1986 prosecutions as compared with 340.7 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States — was the most active during July 2025.
The District of Montana ranked 2nd.
District of Washington, D.C. (Washington) is now ranking 3rd.
The District of Washington, D.C. (Washington) was ranked 1 a year ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were
Montana , now ranked
2nd
, and South Dakota
at 4th
In the same order, these districts ranked 17th and 24th one year ago and 14th and 49th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth
in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago — 97 percent — was
Nebraska .
Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth — 975 percent — was
Northern District of Mississippi (Oxford).
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the
largest drop in the rate of prosecutions — 77.6 percent — was
Washington, D.C. (Washington).
This was the same district that had the largest increase — 15.4 percent — when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during July 2025 are shown in Table 4.
A total of 3 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita, while the remaining 7 judges were from other districts.
Judge Jennifer L. Thurston in the Eastern District of California (Sacramento) ranked 1st with 42 defendants in cases.
Judge Thurston also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 5).
Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive in the District of Puerto Rico ranked 2nd with 19 defendants in cases.
Judge Steven Douglas Merryday in the Middle District of Florida (Tampa) ranked 3rd with 16 defendants in cases.