Judge Audra R. Behne

FY 2021 - 2026*, Los Angeles - Wla Immigration Court

*data covers the first 9 months of fiscal year 2026

Published Aug 27, 2026

Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Audra R. Behné to begin hearing cases in October2018. Judge Behné earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from California State University,Northridge, and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from the Southwestern University School of Law. From2014 to 2018, she was senior pro bono coordinating attorney for Kids In Need of Defense in LosAngeles. From 2004 to 2018, she was an attorney in private practice. From 2001 to 2004, shewas an associate attorney for Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, in Los Angeles. From1996 to 2001, she was a senior attorney with Korenberg, Abramowitz & Feldun in Encino,California. Judge Behné is a member of the State Bar of California.

Deciding Asylum Cases

Detailed data on decisions by Judge Behne were examined for the period covering fiscal years 2021 through the first 9 months of 2026. During this period, court records show that Judge Behne decided 910 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, she granted asylum for 165, granted 22 other types of relief, and denied relief to 723. Converted to percentage terms, Behne denied 79.5 percent and granted 20.5 percent of asylum cases (including forms of relief other than asylum).

Figure 1 provides a comparison of Judge Behne's denial rate each fiscal year over this recent period. (Rates for years with less than 25 decisions are not shown.)

Nationwide Comparisons

Compared to Judge Behne's denial rate of 79.5 percent, Immigration Court judges across the country denied 62.9 percent of asylum claims during this same period. Judges at the Los Angeles - Wla Immigration Court where Judge Behne decided these cases denied asylum 61.2 percent of the time. See Figure 2.

Judge Behne's asylum grant and denial rates are compared with other judges serving on the same court in this table. Note that when an Immigration Judge serves on more than one court during the same period, separate Immigration Judge reports are created for any Court in which the judge rendered at least 100 asylum decisions.

Why Do Denial Rates Vary Among Judges?

Although denial rates are shaped by each Judge's judicial philosophy, denial rates are also shaped by other factors, such as the types of cases on the Judge's docket, the detained status of immigrant respondents, current immigration policies, and other factors beyond an individual Judge's control. For example, TRAC has previously found that legal representation and the nationality of the asylum seeker are just two factors that appear to impact asylum decision outcomes.

The composition of cases may differ significantly between Immigration Courts in the country. Within a single Court when cases are randomly assigned to judges sitting on that Court, each Judge should have roughly a similar composition of cases given a sufficient number of asylum cases. Then variations in asylum decisions among Judges on the same Immigration Court would appear to reflect, at least in part, the judicial philosophy that the Judge brings to the bench. However, if judges within a Court are assigned to specialized dockets or hearing locations, then case compositions are likely to continue to differ and can contribute to differences in asylum denial rates.

Representation

When asylum seekers are not represented by an attorney, almost all of them (74%) are denied asylum. In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of represented asylum seekers are successful. In the case of Judge Behne, 7.9% were not represented by an attorney. See Figure 3. For the nation as a whole, about 18.8% of asylum seekers are not represented.

Nationality

Asylum seekers are a diverse group. Over one hundred different nationalities had at least one hundred individuals claiming asylum decided during this period. As might be expected, immigration courts located in different parts of the country tend to have proportionately larger shares from some countries than from others. And, given the required legal grounds for a successful asylum claim, asylum seekers from some nations tend to be more successful than others.

The largest group of asylum seekers appearing before Judge Behne came from Guatemala. Individuals from this country made up 17.9% of her caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Behne were: Mexico (15.9%), El Salvador (13.3%), Colombia (8.7%), China (7.6%). See Figure 4.

In the nation as a whole during this same period, major nationalities of asylum seekers, in descending order of frequency, were Honduras (10.1%), Guatemala (9.4%), Mexico (9.1%), El Salvador (8.7%), Venezuela (6.8%), Colombia (5.6%), Ecuador (5.3%), Nicaragua (4.8%), India (4.7%), China (4.7%), Russia (3.3%), Brazil (3.2%), Peru (2.9%).