(03 Jun 2025)
Immigration criminal prosecutions jumped in March 2025. The latest available case-by-case data
indicate U.S. Attorneys charged 4,550 defendants with immigration offenses in U.S. District Courts in
March, up 36.6 percent over February when 3,332 defendants were charged.
Seven out of ten referrals for criminal immigration prosecutions originated with Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) while the remaining three out of ten were referred from Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE).
Immigration convictions also made up the majority of all federal court criminal convictions. Out of a
total of 10,965 federal convictions for all types of offenses in March 2025, federal convictions for
immigration offenses made up 57.5 percent.
Immigration prosecutions, however, remain far below the highs they reached during the first Trump
administration. During FY 2019 the annual number of criminal prosecutions was just under 120,000, and
monthly totals were frequently over 10,000 per month under Trump.
Not all immigration offenses saw increased use in March 2025. In fact, prosecutions for harboring
under Title 8 Section 1324 of the U.S. Code actually fell by 13 percent and are below the levels under
former President Biden. Harboring has been used broadly to prosecute people who provide physical
shelter or help immigrants illegally enter the country.
The biggest jump in immigration prosecutions occurred for illegal entry under 8 U.S.C. 1325. Illegal
entry is a petty criminal offense and generally results in little if any jail time. The largest
component in March 2025 was for criminal prosecutions for illegal reentry under Title 8 U.S.C. 1326,
but its growth was lower. While illegal reentry is a more serious offense and can result in
significant prison sentences. However, in the past it was often pled down to illegal entry.
Some caution is needed in reading too much into prosecutions for a single month. Since President Trump
assumed office last January, the primary emphasis has been on increasing immigration
civil arrests and removals. Whether this administration will increase its use of
criminal prosecutions that could compete with available staffing is yet unclear.
This report is based on case-by-case records from the Department of Justice ordered released each
month to TRAC after successful and lengthy litigation under the Freedom of Information Act. TRACfed (a
subscription service) linked off of our home page at tracreports.org allows the public to drill into
these data for each federal judicial district by lead charge and lead investigative agency referrals,
declinations, prosecutions and convictions.
TRAC is a self-supporting, nonpartisan, and independent research organization specializing in
data collection and analysis on federal enforcement, staffing, and spending. We produce multiple
reports every month on critical issues, and we also provide comprehensive data analysis tools.
|
To know more about our work, click
here.
|
|